首页> 外文OA文献 >Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy
【2h】

Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy

机译:耐网球肘:冲击波疗法与经皮腱鞘切开术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Fifty-six patients who suffered from chronic persistent tennis elbow of more than six months duration were randomly assigned to two active treatment groups. Group 1 (n = 29) received high-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT; 1,500 shocks) at 18 kV (0.22 mJ/mm2) without local anaesthesia; group 2 (n = 27) underwent percutaneous tenotomy of the common extensor origin. Both groups achieved improvement from the base line at three weeks, six weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months post-intervention. The success rate (Roles and Maudsley score: excellent and good) at three months in the ESWT group was 65.5% and in the tenotomy group was 74.1%. ESWT appeared to be a useful noninvasive treatment method that reduced the necessity for surgical procedures.
机译:将56名持续时间超过六个月的慢性持续性网球肘患者随机分为两个积极治疗组。第1组(n = 29)在18 kV(0.22 mJ / mm2)的条件下接受了高能体外冲击波治疗(ESWT; 1,500次电击),而没有局部麻醉;第2组(n = 27)进行了常见伸肌来源的经皮腱膜切开术。两组在干预后三周,六周,十二周和十二个月均较基线水平有所改善。 ESWT组三个月的成功率(Roles和Maudsley评分:优异和良好)为65.5%,而切腱术组为74.1%。 ESWT似乎是一种有用的非侵入性治疗方法,减少了外科手术的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号